2026 pricing breakdown

The pricing nobody publishes

Real 2026 numbers for SportsEngine, LeagueApps, TeamSnap and UpperHand, what a custom site actually costs from a public bid record, and the point where a flat fee stops being cheaper than a percentage — including where we lose.

You’ll get it on the next screen — no waiting on an email. Ticking the box above is optional and doesn’t change that.

Program Management

Collecting dues without chasing parents in April

Two football helmets meeting at the instant of collision, a shower of sparks suspended between them.

Every program has the April conversation. Season is two thirds gone, the tournament entry fees are due, and somewhere between four and fourteen families have not finished paying. Nobody wants to be the person who sends that message, so it gets sent late, by someone who also coaches, and it is more apologetic than it needs to be.

That is not a payments problem. Payments are the easy part — the money moves fine when somebody asks. It is a record problem.

Why it actually breaks

Three failures, and almost every program has at least two:

There is no single list. Dues live in a payment app, the roster lives in a spreadsheet, and the sibling discount lives in an email from January. Reconciling them is a job, so it happens monthly at best, which means you find out about a problem six weeks after it started.

Nobody owns the ask. Chasing money from people you see at the field every weekend is genuinely unpleasant. When it is nobody's explicit job, it becomes nobody's job.

The family does not know either. This is the one that gets missed. A parent who paid a deposit in January often has no idea what is still outstanding, because nothing ever told them. They are not avoiding you. They think they are square.

What actually fixes it

Not a payment processor. A processor moves money that somebody already decided to send.

  • One record per family, visible to them. If a parent can open their own page and see a balance, a large share of your late payments resolve themselves with no conversation at all.
  • Scheduled reminders that are not from a person. "Your balance of $X is due on the 15th" sent automatically is a system message. The same sentence from the treasurer at 9pm is a confrontation. Same words, completely different relationship.
  • Payment plans that are actually tracked. Half now and half in May is a perfectly reasonable arrangement that turns into a problem the moment it only exists in one person's head.
  • A single "who owes what" view somebody checks weekly, because it takes ten seconds rather than an evening.

Done properly, the April conversation mostly stops happening — not because families changed, but because nothing was allowed to drift for three months unnoticed.

The money side, said plainly

Two things worth being precise about, because this is where marketing tends to get slippery.

Card processing costs something, always. Whatever platform you use, a card payment carries a fee. The question is only who charges it and whether they are transparent about it. Some platforms bundle their own cut into a single percentage so you cannot see the split.

We take 0% of your registrations — and you keep your own payment processor, so your card fees are whatever Stripe charges you. Those two halves belong in the same sentence. Anybody telling you a platform makes your transaction fees disappear is describing something that does not exist.

The genuine saving from consolidating is not the processing rate. It is the hours, and the money that arrives in March instead of June.

Start here if you do nothing else

Before you change any software: write down who owes what today, and send every one of them their balance. Not a chase — a statement.

It takes an afternoon, it is uncomfortable once, and it will tell you more about whether you have a systems problem or a collections problem than any demo will.

BookSee yours first